Knowable Word - Bible study help

How Nineteenth-Century Americans Used the Bible to Support Both Slavery and Abolition

March 25, 2022 By Peter Krol

You might be aware of the fact that many Christians used the Bible to support southern slavery in early U.S. history. Did you also know that many people used the Bible to support abolition? How is it possible that groups of people can all believe in the basic truth that the Bible is God’s word, communicating truth to us, and yet reach opposite conclusions on such huge issues?

We can see the same thing playing out with respect to many other issues today: customs for worship, preaching, and church life. Doctrines surrounding sacraments, church government, salvation, and the moral law. Political issues such as immigration, financial policy, and foreign intervention. Social issues such as abortion, race relations, homosexuality, and gender ideology. On nearly any issue, it is not difficult to find people who claim to believe the Bible, who also make use of the Bible to support contradictory positions from one another.

Why is that? How can the same book be used for so many contradictory perspectives?

An Answer Worth Considering

While there is a complex range of factors contributing to such a complex situation, there is at least one factor we ought to give more attention to: How are people reading and understanding the Bible? What assumptions do they bring to this ancient book that shape the very methods by which they employ it in support of one position or another?

For example, one person presumes that the most literal, surface reading of a given text ought to be the most persuasive reading. Another person wants to string together a collection of verses that all appear to address a particular topic. Another focuses on their systematic theological system as the governing framework for reading any part of the Bible. Another wants to read the text the same way the heroes of old (or a subset of heroes of old) read it. Yet another wants to read the Bible in tandem with other ancient or modern texts that seem to be saying similar things.

My point is simply that we must not only observe the fact that someone makes use of the Bible to support a position. We must also take note of how they are using the Bible to support a position.

A Conversation Worth Your Time

The thing that spawned these reflections within me was a conversation I just listened to, published by the Mars Hill Audio Journal as one of their Friday Features. The host, Ken Myers, interviewed historian Mark Noll regarding his research on how nineteenth-century Americans went about using the Bible in support of either slavery or abolition in their debates. For now, you can find the interview here. I recommend listening to it as soon as you can, as I cannot promise how long it will remain on their site.

Noll discusses how Christians on both sides of the slavery debate resorted to “proof-texting” to make their case, yet the pro-slavery side tended to be better at it (i.e. more persuasive). Many of the proof-texted arguments in favor of the institution of slavery had no clear rebuttal, and as a result many abolitionists were forced to confess that, while the Bible permits the institution of slavery, they just couldn’t support the American expression of it. This led the pro-slavery camp to instill fear that abolition was simply the beginning of the slippery slope toward denying biblical authority at all.

There were a few shining (abolitionist) stars along the way, however, who were able to demonstrate abolitionist conclusions from biblical texts, through careful contextual study of those texts, tracing the unfolding revelation of God over time. In that day, however, proof-texting was believed to be the best way to arrive at truth, so such careful theological and contextual arguments often went unnoticed or unregarded.

I am confident I am not doing full justice to Noll’s research. So again, I commend to you the recording of his conversation with Myers for more detailed nuance and explanation. I commend it to you highly, as an example of why it is crucial that we not merely quote Bible verses but study them in context so as to grasp the larger arguments of the original authors. How we study the Bible matters.

Share or follow:

What Book Should New Believers Read First?

March 23, 2022 By Peter Krol

I’ve often been asked where people new to the Bible should start with the Bible. Which book of the Bible should they read first?

I believe the best answer to the question is: whichever book they are most likely to enjoy reading. So my typical response is to ask them what sort of literature they already enjoy: stories, poetry, non-fiction, etc. Then I propose some options within the Bible that are most similar in genre.

But with that said, there is certainly a place for giving more direction for guided reading to assist folks who are new to the Bible. And to that end, this article by Eden Parker has some wonderful advice. Not only does she provide two “best” options for where to begin; she also provides sound advice to guide the expectations of those just beginning to read the Bible.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

Do Your Best

March 18, 2022 By Peter Krol

My third commandment for commentary usage is:

You shall make every effort to form interpretive conclusions or questions about interpretations before consulting a commentary.

Is this because I think you won’t need any help?

The Short Answer

No.

A More Nuanced Answer

I’m not suggesting that you utterly bar yourself from the insights of commentaries early in your Bible study process. Last week, I suggested that different kinds of questions need different methods for finding the answers. That’s why this third commandment says that you shall make every effort to form interpretive conclusions or questions about interpretations before consulting a commentary.

In other words, if your question is more observational in nature, then go ahead and consult a commentary. Find quickly those answers ye seek. Do you just need a map? Do you need a historical tidbit? Do you not remember a proper name? Is a particular term unfamiliar to you? Just do it. Take a look; get some help.

This third commandment focuses on the process of interpretation, after observation (or in light of it). And my exhortation to you is to learn how to do the work for yourself. Paul told Timothy to “do your best” in his handling of Scripture (2 Tim 2:15). The standard for evaluation is not getting everything perfect, but for personal progress to be visible (1 Tim 4:15).

So to make progress, you need to learn how to wrestle with the text. You need foster your curiosity and learn how to investigate. You need to gain more confidence from the text than from the experts.

So I encourage you to do your own work first. Observe and interpret, all the way up to the point where you have a guess at the author’s main point. Once there, you’re in the best position to read and consider what others have said about your text. You’ll have firm footing from which to evaluate what they say, testing everything, that you may hold fast to what is good and reject what is bad (1 Thess 5:20-22).

Six Reasons You Should Have Your Own Interpretive Ideas Before Consulting a Commentary

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him” (Prov 18:17). The first commentary you read will likely seem to be right. Unless it’s not your first time reflecting that deeply on the text.
Commentators often disagree with one another. Why shouldn’t you be able to disagree with them when necessary?
Commentators often change their minds from their earlier writings to their later writings. They are constantly re-evaluating and re-thinking their conclusions based on new insights into the text. So why shouldn’t you do the same with their conclusions?
It is more important for you to make progress in your ability to handle the word than for you to have perfect answers for any given text. If you can get answers only by reading a commentary, what happens if you lose access to your commentaries? Or can’t find a decent one for the next book you study?
If you teach, people will ask you questions the commentary may not have answered. If you haven’t learned to answer your own questions from the text, how will you help others learn how to do that?
Over-reliance or premature reliance on commentaries comes dangerously close to establishing those commentators as a high priestly class through whom your relationship with God is mediated. Jesus died to tear the veil and give you access to the very mind and heart of God through his word.

For the Record

And less you misunderstand my perspective, let me repeat: Once you have a guess at the author’s main point, consult some commentaries! You should welcome the help. It would not be wise to cut yourself off from the trained insights of others to guide you toward even further progress. Do your best.

Share or follow:

The Danger of Quoting Verses

March 16, 2022 By Peter Krol

Brandon Smith has a helpful piece on the danger of what he calls “stacking verses,” where we quote verses in isolation for inspiration or to support a particular point.

Some modern examples include Instagram posts and coffee mugs that quote Philippians 4:13 or Jeremiah 29:11. In both cases, these verses appear to promise material, physical, or even eternal blessing from God. However, in both cases, the context of the passage reveals that these verses are a promise of provision amid suffering.
Stacking up these verses might be innocent for some, but this is also the root of the dangerous prosperity gospel that has infiltrated the global church. From as early as Jesus’s ministry to our world today, verse-stacking has plagued the church and brought about countless negative consequences.

The devil quoted a Bible verse to Jesus, attempting to persuade him to test his Father. Ancient heretics had plenty of Bible verses to support their hell-bound doctrines. Sadly, many continue the same practice today.

The problem is not merely in quoting individual verses. It is the danger of quoting verses independent of their context and misaligned with the original author’s intention. Smith provides two interpretive convictions that will help us to avoid much of the danger:

The Bible is a coherent theological book before it is anything else.
The Bible is a canon—a set of 66 books that serve as the rule or measuring rod of our theology.

You should check out his piece to see how he fleshes this all out. I commend his article to you.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

Context Matters: The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things

March 14, 2022 By Ryan Higginbottom

Perhaps you’ve heard that our hearts are deceitful, wicked, and sick beyond all cure. You’ve been taught that our desires should always be questioned and our impulses should always be doubted. Anything we want—because that want blooms in our heart—should be suspect.

This is no inspirational teaching, so you won’t spot it on posters or mugs. But I see this verse dashed into arguments like salt in soup. Are we using using this verse properly? When we learn to read the Bible like a book and not as isolated bullet points, we’ll see that some familiar phrases don’t mean all that we’ve always assumed.

The Immediate Context

The verse in question is found in Jeremiah 17:9. Here it is with some surrounding context.

Thus says the Lord:
“Cursed is the man who trusts in man
and makes flesh his strength,
whose heart turns away from the Lord.
He is like a shrub in the desert,
and shall not see any good come.
He shall dwell in the parched places of the wilderness,
in an uninhabited salt land.

Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord,
whose trust is the Lord.
He is like a tree planted by water,
that sends out its roots by the stream,
and does not fear when heat comes,
for its leaves remain green,
and is not anxious in the year of drought,
for it does not cease to bear fruit.”

The heart is deceitful above all things,
and desperately sick;
who can understand it?
“I the Lord search the heart
and test the mind,
to give every man according to his ways,
according to the fruit of his deeds.” (Jeremiah 17:5–10)

We first observe the connection between a man’s heart and his trust. A “man who trusts in man” is one whose “heart turns away from the Lord” (Jer 17:5). This man is cursed. In contrast, the man is blessed who “trusts in the Lord,” and from the structure we infer that his heart does not turn from the Lord.

This connection is essential to a proper understanding of this passage, and it is evident throughout Jeremiah’s prophecy as well. (More on this later.) This is also true in the larger context of the Bible—the heart is not primarily the origin of feelings; it is the control center for trust and worship.

We further see that the question asked in verse 9 (“who can understand it?”) is answered in verse 10 (“I the Lord”). Even if man cannot know his own heart, the Lord understands it well enough to treat everyone “according to the fruit of [their] deeds” (Jer 17:10).

Before moving on, we should examine the paragraph just prior to this passage. God is speaking, and he says that “the sin of Judah” is “written on the tablet of their heart” (Jer 17:1). The children of Judah have altars and Asherim (wooden idol-worship poles) “beside every green tree and on the high hills, on the mountains in the open country” (Jer 17:2–3). Turning away from God involves both turning to other people and turning to idols.

The Broader Context

In Jeremiah 16, the Lord tells Jeremiah what he should say when others ask what sin the people have committed against God.

Because your fathers have forsaken me, declares the Lord, and have gone after other gods and have served and worshiped them, and have forsaken me and have not kept my law, and because you have done worse than your fathers, for behold, every one of you follows his stubborn, evil will, refusing to listen to me. (Jeremiah 16:11–12)

The primary way that God’s people rebelled against him in Jeremiah’s day was to forsake him, turning to and serving other gods. As we can see from earlier in this prophetic book, it is the people’s hearts that lead them astray.

The “people [have] a stubborn and rebellious heart; they have turned aside and gone away.” They do not fear the Lord (Jer 5:23–24).
The people “stubbornly followed their own hearts and have gone after the Baals, as their fathers taught them” (Jer 9:14).
“This evil people, who refuse to hear my words, who stubbornly follow their own heart and have gone after other gods to serve them and worship them” (Jer 13:10).

There are numerous other examples in the first 16 chapters of Jeremiah which mention Israel’s idolatry and turning away from God. (Most of Jeremiah 10:1–16 is a contrast between the Lord and idols, showing just how ridiculous it is to prefer idols over God.)

Conclusion

Modern Christians like to seize upon the word “heart” in Jeremiah 17:9; they point it as an accusing finger and waive it as a grand caution flag. But this verse was written to a particularly idolatrous people in a specific time. Jeremiah had exhorted them repeatedly about the tendency of their hearts to prefer other gods to the Lord.

This does not mean that 21st century Christians are exempt from warning in this passage. God’s people were led by their hearts away from him before, and the same can (and does!) happen to us. We also must watch our desires, our trust, and our security. But this verse does not teach that we must be suspicious of our every thought or emotion.

Context matters.

For more examples of why context matters, click here.

Share or follow:

Commentaries are Not for When Bible Study is Hard

March 11, 2022 By Peter Krol

A few weeks back, I proposed ten commandments for commentary usage. Those commandments arose from further reflection on the maxim “not whether but when.” I would now like to take a few weeks to expand on each of the “commandments.”

Commandment #1 (“You shall not avoid or ignore commentaries from belief in self-sufficiency to study the Scriptures”) was thoroughly addressed in the “not whether but when” post, so I will not delve into it any further. Let’s now pick up with commandment #2:

You shall not pick up a commentary as soon as Bible study is “hard.”

The Problem

I’m not embarrassed to admit it: Bible study is hard. If we have ever communicated otherwise on this blog, I repent in dust and ashes.

The Bible was written long ago, to people in cultures very different than ours. It was written in languages no longer spoken to address situations no longer extant. The worldviews and assumptions of the Bible’s authors were radically distinct from those held by most today. Even the Bible’s “easier” terminology consists of concepts that prompt very different images today than they would have prompted to the original authors and audiences (for example: church, faith, preach, law, gospel, righteousness, wisdom, salvation, etc.). The Bible’s poetry uses metaphors in a very different way than we use metaphors today. The Bible’s narratives refer to places most of us have never been to. The Bible’s discourses refute arguments people often aren’t arguing about any more.

I’m trying not to overstate the differences, because it is certainly the case that very little has changed in terms of the general human plight and human experience from ancient to postmodern times. But the fact remains that we need a lot of help to understand the people, cultures, situations, concerns, and arguments of the Bible.

A Multi-Faceted Solution

Before running immediately to commentaries when Bible study is hard, I find it critical to distinguish between the different kinds of interpretive questions that can arise.

What? questions define the terms. (“What did he mean?”)
Why? questions uncover the author’s purpose. (“Why did he say that?”)
So What? questions draw out the implications. (“So what does he want me to do about it?”)

In general, the first category of questions often complete your observation. This category involves questions such as:

What is Passover?
Where is Ephesus?
Who was Abraham?
What OT passage is this NT text quoting from?
What is propitiation?

And for such “what” questions—where you simply need to get something defined, clarified, referenced, or mapped out—a commentary or study Bible may be your best ally. Go right ahead and work to close that knowledge gap between the original audience and yourself, by checking out a helpful resource that can quickly put you in their shoes. There is not much reason to hold back from using commentaries on such questions.

But the other categories of questions warrant a different approach. When you have a “why” question (such as “why does the author say such and such?” or “why does he tell this story in this way?”), you are better off not running to commentaries too quickly. The “why” questions are the heart of interpretation, and their main purpose is to help you figure out the author’s main point or primary argument. If that is hard for you to do, you are in good company. But the solution is not to find “the answers” in a commentary or study Bible. If you do that, how will you be able to evaluate whether that commentator’s answers are true (strong, reasonable, probable, wise) or not? Your best help is to learn how to follow the argument of the text itself. That will give you the best measuring rod against which to evaluate competing interpretations given by others.

And when you have a “so what” question, working toward the implications and applications for you or the people you want to teach, no commentator will know your situation better than you do. Sure, commentaries can help suggest broad ideas or topics for potential application. But they won’t be able to connect the text to your life, today. When your “so what” questions are hard to answer, the best solution is further reflection on the main point, along with prayerful reflection on how to correlate it with the rest of Scripture, and especially with the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Bible study is hard. And using commentaries just because Bible study is hard might not be the solution you’re looking for. In fact, it has the potential for grounding you deeper and deeper in a web of presumption from which you struggle to get untangled.

Share or follow:

Who is the Parable of the Tenants About?

March 9, 2022 By Peter Krol

In a back issue of Tabletalk magazine, Charles K. Telfer has a helpful piece on the parable of the tenants (Matt 21:33-46). In this parable, Jesus describes a vineyard owner who sends his representative to collect fruit from those who have rented the vineyard, who refuse to hand it over. They kill each messenger, up to and including the owner’s own son. The vineyard owner then declares war on the rebels and hands his vineyard over to others who will serve him more faithfully.

In the course of explaining the parable, Telfer makes an important move. He does not immediately look for what the parable says about us, as so many are so quick to do when they study the Scriptures. First, Telfer looks for what the parable says about them—those to whom Jesus was speaking, and especially those to whom Matthew was writing.

The initial historical fulfillment of these prophecies took place in the disasters of AD 66–70 and 132–35, when the Romans destroyed the temple, the city of Jerusalem, and most of the leaders of the people.

This leads him to some crucial conclusions about Jesus’ purpose in this parable:

Look at what Jesus underlines as the foundational offense: rejecting Him. Jesus puts Himself forward as the Son in special relationship with the Father. C.S. Lewis argues cogently that no one can take Jesus as just another good moral teacher. He must be either the Messiah or a megalomaniac. Jesus claims that rejecting Him is the climactic act that leads to judgment. Jesus puts Himself at the center of Yahweh’s purposes in the way He quotes the Old Testament in the parable. In verse 42, He applies Psalm 118:22–23 to Himself: “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone” (see Isa. 28:16). In essence, Jesus is asserting, “The powerful may consider Me a valueless reject, but God will do marvels through Me and give Me a kingdom.” More soberly still, in Matthew 21:44, Jesus presents Himself as the dangerous stone (Isa. 8:14; Dan. 2:34, 44). “Don’t brush Me aside!” He is saying.

And then—get this!—Telfer shows how the early church made application from this parable, and he draws some compelling applications for us today.

Telfer’s analysis is a great example of how our application for people today will be even stronger if we don’t go there too quickly. Go the long way around, by first making sure you’ve grasped how the passage spoke to the original audience, pointing them to Jesus. And then your application for today will connect with much greater force.

Please take a look at how Telfer does this. Check it out!

Share or follow:

Additional Prizes for This Year’s Bible Reading Challenge

March 4, 2022 By Peter Krol

In case the fact has slipped your mind, we still have a Bible reading challenge underway. All you have to do is read the entire Bible within 90 days, and then you can enter to win a free Logos 9 Silver base package. See here for the complete rules. You still have plenty of time to complete the reading by March 31, and if you’re just getting started, you may count anything you have read since January 1.

When I announced this year’s challenge, and in the reminders since, I’ve off-handedly mentioned that there will be several prizes given in addition to the grand prize. I’m now ready to divulge what those additional prizes will be.

We’ve been working on some updated and new resources to help you learn to both study the Bible for yourself and lead Bible studies for others.

First, my book Knowable Word has been revised and expanded with a second edition.

Second, my new book on how to lead small group Bible studies will soon be available!

I’ll write more about both books another time. But for this year’s reading challenge, three winners will receive copies of both books. So make sure to finish strong and use the form below to let us know how it went for you. So far, we have 13 entries in the drawing. I expect quite a bit more to pour in this month as the deadline approaches. But still—your chances of winning a prize are pretty good!

Share or follow:

Studying the Bible is Hard Work

March 2, 2022 By Peter Krol

This brief piece by Craig Thompson highlights the fact that Bible study will not be easy, and that we must be okay with that.

Studying the Bible is hard work, but that is OK. God never promised that it would be easy. He is, after all, eternal, all-powerful, and always present. God is outside of our complete understanding. Attempting to wrap our brains completely around eternity or the Trinity will leave us with a headache.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

The Dangers of Recycling Bible Studies

February 28, 2022 By Ryan Higginbottom

As a teacher, there is a huge difference between teaching a class for the first time and teaching a class for the second (or third) time. When I’m new to a class, I prepare each class meeting from scratch—the lectures, the discussion questions, the activities, and the assignments. It’s a lot of work.

When I teach a class that’s not new, I can breathe a little easier. I can anticipate the common pitfalls, I know which lessons need to be improved, and my previous notes serve as a starting point.

Bible teachers may feel this same way. When teaching a lesson they’ve been through before, they think preparation will be a breeze. I’ve thought this same thing. And those have been some of the worst studies I’ve ever led.

What’s the Danger?

The biggest danger with recycling Bible studies is assuming that gaining information is the most important goal in a Bible study. A leader can think that if they’ve saved their earlier notes, they only need to brush up on the particulars and walk a familiar path. Surely the truths in the Bible haven’t changed, so if the study worked last time, why change a thing?

A leader with this mindset is missing a vital ingredient of teaching the Bible. Effective Bible teachers must be transformed by the text. A Bible study should aim much deeper than a mere transfer of knowledge.

If there is too much time between when I wrestle with the application of a Bible passage and when I teach that passage, I lose much of the power of my transformation to help others. My friends cannot see as clearly how the passage has changed me, so their application may lack the teeth it otherwise would have had.

I’ve even experienced this on those rare occasions when I finish my Bible study preparation “too far” in advance. If I don’t revisit all parts of the lesson before the meeting, the discussion can be weak and tepid. I try not to use this as justification for procrastination, but I know that my studies are generally more lively and the learning more lasting when I complete my preparation within a few days of the meeting.

Should We Avoid Recycling?

I don’t think we need to draw a line in the sand and insist on preparing every Bible lesson from scratch. However, we need to take great care when taking “old” material to new settings. Here are some practices that might be helpful in reusing old Bible studies.

We should prayerfully consider using recycled material in the first place. We need to weigh the risks against the benefits and take time to minimize those risks. And, yes, all of this should not just be done deliberately, but prayerfully.

As much as possible, we should approach the Bible passage fresh. Even though we’ve previously studied the passage, we should read it several times and, without looking at our old notes, try to understand what the passage says. In some ways, we should consult our previous work as we would use study Bible notes or a commentary. (This is good motivation for making and preserving decent notes when preparing Bible studies!)

After we’ve gotten a good handle on the structure and main idea of a passage, we should turn to personal application. Remember, the most effective leaders are the ones who have been transformed by the passage they are teaching. We skip this step at great cost to ourselves and our Bible study group members.

One note here about application. It may be helpful to include details on personal application when writing our leader’s notes for a study. (We just said they might be valuable in the future!) But, we rarely encounter a passage the same way twice. We are different people from month to month, so our application will—and, likely, should—change. We may have different people in our lives, different temptations to resist, different challenges with which we need to trust the Lord. So, our notes from a previous study will describe how God changed us last time, but that won’t be as powerful as sharing how God is changing us now. (There is a similar lesson here for preachers about recycling sermons, but I’ll leave that for someone else to tackle.)

Seek the Spirit’s Warming

When we prepare to teach the Bible, we need the Spirit to warm us—to change us—by his word. And if we teach that material again in the future, we need to ask the Spirit to bring us close to the heat and transform us anew. This gives us the best chance to share the fire with our friends.

Share or follow:

« Previous Page