Knowable Word - Bible study help

The Order of Old Testament Books

February 16, 2022 By Peter Krol

Did you know that your English Bible puts the Old Testament books in a different order than was used by Jewish traditions? Noah Diekemper makes a brief yet strong case for rearranging the books in our Bibles to be more like Jews have ordered them for millennia. Among his reasons are the effect of the order on our understanding of various books, and the manner in which Jesus himself referred to the Old Testament. Diekemper’s conclusion:

The order that our Bibles printed the Old Testament in is a silent conversation. Bibles are printed in the conventional order either for the sake of mere convention (the lowest form of conservatism), or else because the question is never raised to arrange them otherwise. But when the evidence of historical orderings and intertextual links is considered, the order of the Biblia Hebraica presents a more intelligible whole, a work that more visibly testifies to the singular intelligence responsible for its authorship.

For my annual Bible speed read, I no longer follow the English order of the OT books. I find it makes it more difficult to read in large chunks, especially since it puts so many difficult books together for the last third of the OT, without much contextualizing of them to assist the reader. The Hebrew order seems to have readers more in mind, since the Prophets include some of what we consider histories, and the corpus ends not with persistent prophetic denunciation, but with generally hopeful reflections on life lived in service to Yahweh God (the Writings).

Diekemper’s piece will help you to understand more of the benefits of rearranging the books, and how this in no way violates belief in biblical inerrancy or authority.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

Essential Resources for Bible Teachers

February 14, 2022 By Ryan Higginbottom

When corresponding with a friend last month, I recommended some Knowable Word resources for teaching the Bible. In this short post, I’m sharing those same recommendations with you. (These recommendations were at the top of my mind because I use them frequently myself. We have many posts on the blog about teaching and leading.)

Classroom or Small Group Study

While not identical, these resources can be used to prepare for either a class or small group setting. My first two recommendations are series of posts which live at the core of this website.

When teaching the Bible, the first and most important step is to understand what the Bible is saying. This blog was created to help with this goal! Start with this page on OIA Bible study.

Because we want to help people lead Bible studies, we also have a series of posts dedicated to this sort of training.

Helpful Worksheets

When preparing to teach or lead a Bible study myself, there are two worksheets that I use regularly. (You can find these and more on our Resources page.)

Teacher Preparation Worksheet — Once I’ve studied a Bible passage, this worksheet helps me organize my thoughts and create a plan for the class or small group. It also reminds me to apply the Bible to myself as the most effective way to help my friends apply it. I explain all of the details of this worksheet in this post. (I have updated this worksheet since I first posted it so that it now matches our other worksheets in appearance. Quite fancy.)
Question Writing Worksheet — One of the keys to a good class or small group is crafting engaging questions. This is hard work! I introduced this worksheet in this post, which followed a series on how to ask good questions in a small group setting.

Teaching the Bible is a great joy. It is also a great responsibility, one which we should not take lightly. It is our hope at Knowable Word that these and other resources might help you in this noble work.

Share or follow:

Commentaries: Not Whether But When

February 11, 2022 By Peter Krol

Against Commentaries?

One common objection to the OIA method of Bible study is that it trains people to think they can interpret the Bible on their own, in a vacuum, apart from history, tradition, or scholarship. Just me and my Bible; that’s all I need. And the more exciting and novel my interpretation, the better.

I can understand when folks feel they must register this objection. On this blog, we’ve certainly gone out of our way to advise against becoming a commentary junkie. We’ve labeled them “false authorities.” We’ve likened them to gasoline, which is poisonous if you drink it straight instead of sloshing it into a working engine.

And sadly, some folks have heard us advising them to avoid commentaries altogether. Despite recommending them, listing them among our main tools, and labeling avoidance of them as the #1 mistake with respect to them.

By No Means!

So let me affirm with frank directness: I’m not sure I could study the Bible well without commentaries. I commend, with utmost fervency, the practice of utilizing them. And I believe that the person who has access to quality commentaries but refuses to make use of them is playing the fool.

So I agree that rejection of commentaries is an error to avoid. However, my experience has bellowed at me that a far more frequent commentary error is not their disuse but their misuse. In the name of staying connected with Christian tradition and avoiding me-and-Jesus-ism, masses of otherwise thoughtful followers of Jesus engage repeatedly in the unexamined and unreflective commentary binge. All rise! The expert has entered the room and is about to divulge The Truth.

Therefore, the flag we’ve chosen to wave on this blog—more than its sibling flag which likewise deserves to waltz with the wind—is the flag of suspicious caution toward commentary usage. The flag of “but what does the text say?” The flag of “observe and interpret the text and don’t merely observe and interpret the commentary.”

Not Whether But When

In short, my recommendation regarding commentaries boils down to the maxim: not whether but when.

I do not dispute whether we ought to make use of commentaries. By all means, yes, yes, yes! In fact, find a few commentators you have especially benefitted from, and buy everything they’ve written. John Stott is one of those for me. As is Douglas Sean O’Donnell, David Helm, and James B. Jordan. I’ve been recently persuaded that Dale Ralph Davis could potentially join this little club of mine, so I’ve begun snapping up his wares whenever I find them on sale, though I have yet to actually read him. Just take note: Whether you would agree 100% with any commentator’s conclusions is utterly beside the point. But more on that in a moment.

The main issue, as I see it, is not whether but when. When do you read your commentaries? When do you shift your gaze away from the text to attend to what others have said about the text? When do you go rooting for help with thorny issues, or looking for answers to your sincere questions?

And that “when” question is intimately connected to its why. Why do you read your commentaries? If it is to figure out what the proper interpretation of the passage is, we need to do some more work. If it’s because you feel stuck and you still need some good material to lead your next small group, you’ll be better off going back to basics. If it’s because you’re just not sure you can be trusted to understand or teach the text, and you need more expert affirmation to instill confidence, then we need to talk further about whose approval matters most to the student or teacher of the Bible (2 Tim 2:15).

The Implications of Interaction

Here is a simple suggestion: We ought to read commentaries for the same reason we ought to have small groups: Interaction. We need community to study the Bible. And that community can come through the written works of scholars just as much as through the spoken conversation of a small group of people.

And if commentaries are most helpful in getting us to interact with others over the text, commentaries are therefore most beneficial when they are treated as conversation partners and not as the definitive word on a passage. For this reason, I’m not terribly concerned with identifying “good” or “bad” commentaries, in the sense of “which ones line up with my denomination or interpretive tradition?” And I don’t have to buy into everything a commentator says or stands by. If the role of a successful commentary is to further the conversation by driving me into closer examination of the text, I can benefit just as much from a commentator I agree with as from a commentator I disagree with. Sometimes, I’ve even learned more from liberal commentators (who can be shockingly honest about what they observe in a text and about what questions they have about it) than from conservative ones (who sometimes don’t observe as closely when a dearly held theological tradition may be at stake).

As a result, my personal definition of what makes a commentary good or bad is: How much that commentary stimulates me to examine the text more closely and understand the author’s argument more clearly. Whenever I find commentaries that do this to a high degree, I add them to my list of recommendations.

Watch Your Timing

So when is the best time to read a commentary? Not first thing, and not in the first nanosecond a question or roadblock occurs to you, but after you have studied the passage for yourself. How far should you have gone in your study before you read a commentary? I speak for myself and not as a command from the Lord, but I have attempted to discipline myself to refrain from employing commentaries until I have a concrete guess as to the author’s main point in the passage.

Crafting a main point is a major milestone in the OIA process, as it represents the climax of the interpretation phase. From there, we want to connect that main point to the person and work of Jesus Christ before we move into application to head, heart, and hands, inward and outward. But before I start landing strong gospel connections or getting into application, I want to invite skilled conversation partners into the discussion to help me shape and hone what I’ve come up with.

And I devour commentaries that will improve my own observation and interpretation of the text, by showing me how to observe and interpret that text more effectively than I have done myself.

Conclusion

Please understand that the OIA method of Bible study is not about getting away from 2,000 years of history and coming up with novel interpretations all by oneself. Commentaries are crucial, as long as we use them the right way and at the right time.

Share or follow:

Context Matters: The Letter Kills

February 9, 2022 By Peter Krol

“The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.” Some have read 2 Cor 3:6 in a way that opposes “Spirit-filled” ministry to “Bible-focused” ministry. I have not come across this particular perspective very often, but Graham Heslop has, and does a wonderful job explaining how the verse’s context reveals a different argument in the mind of the Apostle Paul.

Oft quoted, and always from the King James Version for effect, is 2 Corinthians 3:6. There Paul writes: “The letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life.” This verse is usually cited in support of Spirit led ministries, over against those that prioritise theology and study. Because the letter kills, so the logic goes, we should not overemphasise detailed teaching or a focus on the Bible. For many, Paul’s statement liberates Christian believers from lifeless, dull, and bookish expressions of faith into the exciting and novel. Lively and Spirit led ministries have put the “letter” away, embracing the life-giving work of the Spirit. But is this really the distinction Paul is making?

Check it out!

Share or follow:

The Fragility of Hope in Lamentations 3

February 4, 2022 By Peter Krol

Last year, my collaborator Ryan wrote a wonderful piece on why context matters in Lamentations 3. We sing Chisolm’s comforting poetry (“Summer and winter, springtime and harvest … Great is Thy faithfulness!”) but can easily miss how hard-fought and hard-won such hope really is.

The hope of Lamentations 3 is not the hope of a college acceptance letter or a career promotion. It is more like the cautious and suspicious hope of a positive pregnancy test for a chronically infertile couple. Or the slippery and fragile hope of a brand new widow learning how to manage the finances that had been handled all those years by her dearly departed. Yes, there is hope of good things to come. But such hope has come at great cost.

I encourage you to read Ryan’s piece before continuing, because I would like to build on what he wrote there.

Photo by **RODNAE Productions** from **Pexels**

What is Good, Good, Good

Study Bibles are typically quick to point out that chapters 1 through 4 of Lamentations are all acrostics in the original Hebrew, where each verse begins with the next letter of the Hebrew alphabet in order. In other words, if it were English, verse 1 would start with the letter A, verse two with the letter B, and so on. However, chapter 3 triples the pattern, which is why that chapter has 3 times as many verses. In that chapter, verses 1, 2, and 3 all start with the first letter of the alphabet, verses 4, 5, and 6 with the second letter, and so on.

Now while studying Lamentations 3, I recently read Christopher Wright’s commentary (Bible Speaks Today series), and he observed that there are two places in the chapter where all three verses in a group start with not only the same letter but with the same word. That more emphatic repetition draws closer attention to those stanzas.

The first such stanza is Lam 3:25-27, which all begin with the Hebrew word that gets translated as “good.” Good is Yahweh to those who wait for him, to the soul who seeks him (Lam 3:25). Good it is that one should wait quietly for Yahweh’s salvation (Lam 3:26). Good it is for a man to bear the yoke in his youth (Lam 3:27).

These three reminders of what is good, good, good, take on a crucial role in the poem. In the first 18 verses, the poet took a number of metaphors from the Psalms, such as “Yahweh is my shepherd” and “Yahweh is a mighty warrior,” and he gave them a sinister spin, such that this shepherd has apparently turned the weapons of his warfare against his own sheep. In the midst of such raw feelings and wrestlings, it is critical to recall what is good, good, good.

And note that he does not say that “my suffering is good.” No, he says Yahweh is good. And it is good that my suffering makes me wait for him to show up and rescue. And it is good to learn such patient waiting while we’re young. All of this deepens our trust that our greatest hope is not even the fact that Yahweh’s love and mercy never cease (Lam 3:22-23); our greatest hope is that, at the end of all this suffering and waiting, we get more of him as our share of inheritance (Lam 3:24). Yahweh is my portion; therefore I will hope in him.

So when we go through hard times, let’s make sure to get our definitions right of what is good, good, good.

What It’s All For, For, For

Wright observes that the second stanza with a repeated word at the start of all three lines is Lam 3:31-33. And that word is typically translated as “for.” But this stanza is the second one we should look to for special emphasis.

In these three verses, the poet takes the glorious truths of Lam 3:19-30 and applies them to the dark feelings of Lam 3:1-18. This stanza shows the poet in action, fighting vigorously for that fragile hope in the midst of his agony. This is what it looks like to take truth and apply it to circumstances or feelings.

According to Lam 3:31, the Lord is, without question, the one who has cast him off. His circumstances are not the product of blind fate, angry enemies, or a callous universe. His situation has been decreed from God (“Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that good and bad come?” Lam 3:38). The Lord has cast him off. But he will not do so forever. His mercies never come to an end.

According to Lam 3:32, the Lord is the one who has caused the poet grief. But that is not the end of the story. His steadfast, covenant love never ceases. This love is so abundant that it is bound to spill over and pour out in compassion.

According to Lam 3:33, the Lord afflicts and grieves the children of men. Again, they are not victims to competing forces of good and evil striving for supremacy. No, the Lord has done it. But he does not do it from his heart. His heart toward his people is not one of disappointment and condemnation. His heart of hearts is one of compassionate love.

Fight for Hope

So often in life, hope comes only after a hard fight. Fight to admit how hard life really is. Fight to believe what you know to be true. Fight to confess God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as the one behind all you are going through. If he is responsible for having gotten you into this mess, then only he can truly be responsible to get you out of it. Jesus died and rose to make it happen. The process of learning this and waiting for him to show up and make it right is so good for you and me. That is what inspires us to hope and to trust that what we most need is more of the Lord himself. However fragile that hope may be amid deep affliction.

Share or follow:

5 Conduits for Bible Application

February 2, 2022 By Peter Krol

Joe Carter highlights “5 Ways to Read the Bible for Personal Application.” He explores the idea that the Bible wasn’t written to us but for us. So it ought to shape our lives, but not always by means of direct commands. Those 5 ways are:

Direct commands
General truth
Direct analogy
Indirect analogy
Indirect extension

These are helpful categories for us to consider the manifold means by which we may connect the truth of the Bible to our lives today. The main caveat I would want to add is that, before we attempt to apply a Bible passage, we should first grasp the author’s main point for his audience. Many of the errors Carter enumerates would be solved if we were to apply the authors’ main points instead of isolated sentences that simply strike our fancy.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

Context Matters: Righteous Deeds Are Like Filthy Rags

January 31, 2022 By Ryan Higginbottom

Adapted from Erich Ferdinand (2010), Creative Commons

Perhaps you’ve heard that all our righteous deeds are like filthy rags before God. You’ve been taught that God looks at our works and sees something unclean, a pitiful offering not worthy of his attention.

This phrase is often used to urge sinners to embrace Jesus’s work instead of their own for salvation. But is this a correct use of Isaiah’s words? When we learn to read the Bible as a book and not a loose collection of verses and phrases, we’ll see that some familiar sayings take on different meanings than we’ve always assumed.

No Salvation by Works

This memorable phrase comes from Isaiah 64.

We have all become like one who is unclean,
and all our righteous deeds are like a polluted garment.
We all fade like a leaf,
and our iniquities, like the wind, take us away. (Isaiah 64:6)

I often hear this verse cited to emphasize the emptiness of pursuing salvation by works. The speaker usually comments on how the “polluted garment” may be the Old Testament version of a menstrual cloth—a vivid and effective image. (In my memory, this was an ingredient in the first presentation of the gospel to which I responded!)

The problem, as you may have guessed, is that this verse is often pulled out of context. And when that happens with this particular phrase, young disciples may be left questioning their efforts to obey God. If God views our deeds as bloody rags, why should we try to do anything righteous?

The Meaning of “Righteous”

How could God hate righteous deeds? We only need to look at the surrounding verses to answer this question.

You meet him who joyfully works righteousness,
those who remember you in your ways.
Behold, you were angry, and we sinned;
in our sins we have been a long time, and shall we be saved? (Isaiah 64:5)

The first clause in verse 5 shows that God is not against every attempt at righteousness. Further, this helps us understand that the “righteousness” in Isaiah 64:5 cannot be the same as the “righteous deeds” in Isaiah 64:6. God cannot embrace what he calls unclean.

The “righteous deeds” of verse 6 must be ceremonial tasks (or something similar) done by those who have been in their sins a long time (Isaiah 64:5–6). God hates these deeds because they are not righteous at all.

God Our Father

Another key observation about this passage is how the Lord is being addressed. Yes, the people have sinned and turned away, but the prophet (on behalf of the people) is calling on God as “Father.” (This shows up twice in Isaiah 63:16, and also in Isaiah 64:8.)

The rebellion of God’s people can be so great that “righteous deeds” are like polluted garments. This would not be a surprise to Isaiah’s audience, as it formed the spine of his argument in Isaiah 1:10–17. God wanted offerings, incense, and assemblies to stop because the people did them in vain, with their hands full of blood. Going through the motions without love for the Lord is worthless.

God’s people were privileged to call him “Father,” and as their father he wanted their whole-hearted worship. Offering disjointed obedience to the Lord after being seduced by sin is offensive to the One who has been compassionate and merciful (see Isaiah 63:7–14).

In the modern church, the phrase about righteous deeds being like filthy rags is often used to persuade unbelievers. But in the context of Isaiah 64, God’s people are in view. Unlike unbelievers, they knew what righteous deeds were, but they carried them out with cold hearts.

The Dangers of Sin

There are several passages that could be used to instruct unbelievers about salvation by faith alone. That is a glorious truth, and the church should teach it! But we need not resort to pulling this colorful simile out of context to make the point.

The sobering truth of this passage is that God’s people can be deluded. We can chase after sin so much that our attempts to worship and glorify God are offensive to him.

Context matters.

For more examples of why context matters, click here.

Share or follow:

The Potter’s Right Over the Clay

January 28, 2022 By Peter Krol

Earlier this week, I completed my 2022 Bible readthrough, which was nothing short of a delightful romp through the Scriptures. I always appreciate seeing what new connections the Lord may bring to my attention as I read rapidly.

And one thing that especially struck me this year was the potter metaphor used of the Lord throughout the prophets. This may have been on my mind because my church small group recently studied Romans 9 and discussed the potter metaphor in Rom 9:20-21. I had not fully considered before how Paul draws this imagery from the Old Testament.

When Paul says “Will what is molded say to its molder, ‘Why have you made me like this?'” (Rom 9:20), he appears to be drawing directly on Isaiah 29:16: “You turn things upside down! Shall the potter be regarded as the clay, that the thing made should say of its maker, ‘He did not make me’; or the thing formed say of him who formed it, ‘He has no understanding’?” The context of Isaiah 29 is that of God’s people drawing near to him in their rituals while their hearts remain far from him, attempting to hide from their maker their dark deeds. Paul uses it to support his larger point that not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel. Just because God made some people ethnically Jewish, but still exerts his wrath on their unbelief, does not make him unjust.

The connection I found even more interesting is that with Jeremiah 18:1-12, which I will quote in full:

The word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD: “Arise, and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will let you hear my words.” So I went down to the potter’s house, and there he was working at his wheel. And the vessel he was making of clay was spoiled in the potter’s hand, and he reworked it into another vessel, as it seemed good to the potter to do.
Then the word of the LORD came to me: “O house of Israel, can I not do with you as this potter has done? declares the LORD. Behold, like the clay in the potter’s hand, so are you in my hand, O house of Israel. If at any time I declare concerning a nation or a kingdom, that I will pluck up and break down and destroy it, and if that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I intended to do to it. And if at any time I declare concerning a nation or a kingdom that I will build and plant it, and if it does evil in my sight, not listening to my voice, then I will relent of the good that I had intended to do to it. Now, therefore, say to the men of Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem: ‘Thus says the LORD, Behold, I am shaping disaster against you and devising a plan against you. Return, every one from his evil way, and amend your ways and your deeds.’
“But they say, ‘That is in vain! We will follow our own plans, and will every one act according to the stubbornness of his evil heart.’
Jeremiah 18:1-12, ESV

Jeremiah uses the authority-of-the-potter-over-the-clay metaphor to explain that God himself may change course and treat his people differently than he had predicted if they either repent from, or turn toward, evil. This point is especially striking in the background of Romans 9, where, even after calling unbelieving Israelites “not my people” and “vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,” Paul goes on to express his heart’s desire and his prayer to God that they might still be saved (Rom 10:1). In other words, though the Lord has promised to uproot Israel and remove its branch from his tree (Rom 11:11-24), as soon as they repent and set their hope in Jesus the Messiah, he stands more than ready to smush their clay and begin again with them as a clean and holy vessel.

So I’m glad that Romans was on my brain when my rapid reading took me through the prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah. With such broad Bible reading, such connections and allusions are more likely to stand out and stick.

For those of you willing to try such rapid reading for yourself, don’t forget we’ve currently got a reading challenge underway with a pretty terrific grand prize.

Share or follow:

The Bible’s One Story

January 26, 2022 By Peter Krol

Hugh Whelchel tells the story of the entire Bible as a play in four acts: Creation, Fall, Redemption, and Restoration. He then says:

This four-chapter gospel is not just a way to read the Bible. It’s the framework through which we live our lives. Everyone sees the world through a unique view or perspective, a worldview. As Christians, we see the world through the perspective of the Bible. Think of the four-chapter gospel like a set of prescription glasses that helps us focus our actions and decisions on God’s great story of his creation. When we live with a blurry prescription for a long time, our eyes adjust. Life out of focus becomes routine, and we struggle to realize we could be seeing something more. With a new set of glasses, everything becomes clearer. The four-chapter gospel is just that – the sharpest, most complete view of life that is true for all of humanity. It serves as the most accurate prescription to view and understand the world.

Sadly, we often truncate this story merely to the acts of Fall and Redemption, which leaves us with a thin and uncompelling narrative or explanation for human existence. But the story God has given us in Scripture is a beautiful, glorious story that far outshines all others. Whelchel’s piece is well worth your consideration as you aim to keep the big picture in view.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

How Delightful to Study the Bible with Middle Schoolers

January 21, 2022 By Peter Krol

At my church, I have been teaching Sunday school for the middle schoolers (ages 10-13) so far this academic year. Now I am not the world’s most creative teacher, and there are many others in our church who do a better job with activities, puzzles, and other creative ways to keep the kids engaged. But I have really enjoyed simply doing Bible study with these young people.

We don’t use a snazzy curriculum. I just ask everyone to bring their Bibles so we can teach them how to use them. We have been studying the book of Job together. While we haven’t covered every chapter, we have made sure to cover every major section and phase of the book’s argument.

A few weeks in chapters 1 and 2 set the stage. Then we dwelt on Job’s private lament in chapter 3 before launching into the arguments with his three friends. That’s where we didn’t cover every passage, but I made sure to select certain chapters to study instead of giving them a generalized, disembodied summary of what I thought was taking place. As we read select speeches of Eliphaz, Zophar, and Job, the kids had to wrestle through a number of issues: What is the primary conclusion of this speech? How does the speaker support his argument? What is he saying that is more specific than “you are are suffering because you have sinned,” or “No, I haven’t”? Is this speaker right or wrong? Partially right and partially wrong? How so?

The goal has always been to wrestle with the text itself, giving them the skills they need to read the Bible’s poetry.

My favorite class so far had to be the one on chapter 28, which is probably the most important chapter in the book. I told them of its importance, and they knew we had already reached the end of the first set of debates with friends. But I didn’t give them any hints about the message of chapter 28. So we read it out loud, one stanza at a time, and I just asked them “What is he saying here?” I would not allow them to stare at the sky and tell me how they felt. I required them to stare at the text and show me specific lines and phrases that captured the text’s meaning or argument.

And they did it. They really did it!

With only a few questions from me, they were able to nail down the train of thought: Humanity can dig out of the earth treasures (Job 28:1-6) of which the animals are oblivious (Job 28:7-11). But the treasure of wisdom (Job 28:12) cannot be dug up from the earth (Job 28:13), dived for in the ocean (Job 28:14), bought with money (Job 28:15-16), or traded for jewels (Job 28:17-19). You can’t find it among the living (Job 28:20-21), nor will you find it in the realm of the dead (Job 28:22). God alone knows the way to it (Job 28:23-27) and grants it to those who fear him and turn away from evil (Job 28:28). The kids came up with all of these ideas; I just helped them to put them in words they could remember.

We then discussed what this poem has to do with the rest of the book to this point, drawing connections to the description of Job in chapter 1 as one who feared God and turned away from evil. We spoke of how Jesus shows us such wisdom, and we discussed applications for our own search for wisdom, especially when life falls apart on us.

In short, we had a fabulous study. Believe it or not, 10-to-13-year-old kids can learn how to do really great Bible study, even in strange parts of the Old Testament.

Share or follow:

« Previous Page