Knowable Word

Helping ordinary people learn to study the Bible

  • Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • Why Should You Read This Blog?
    • This Blog’s Assumptions
    • Guest Posts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
  • OIA Method
    • Summary
    • Details
    • Examples
      • Context Matters
      • Interpretive Book Overviews
      • Who is Yahweh: Exodus
      • Wise Up: Proverbs 1-9
      • Feeding of 5,000
      • Resurrection of Jesus
  • Small Groups
    • Leading
      • How to Lead a Bible Study
      • How to Train a Bible Study Apprentice
    • Attending
  • Children
  • Resources
  • Contact

Copyright © 2012–2026 DiscipleMakers, except guest articles (copyright author). Used by permission.

You are here: Home / Archives for Philippians

La importancia del contexto, Parte 2

June 30, 2026 By Peter Krol

This is a Spanish translation of a post from our archive. For the original post in English, please click the “Publicación original” link at the top of the post. For further explanation of why we’re posting articles in Spanish for a season, see this announcement.

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

Vimos lo fácil que es sacar versículos fuera de su contexto, un poco como Pinky, sacando las preguntas de “¿Estás pensando…?” de Cerebro fuera de su contexto. Hoy, me gustaría mostrarte cómo el contexto hace que la interpretación tome vida.

Considera esta colección de verdades gloriosas:

  • Alégrense siempre en el Señor.
  • No se preocupen por nada; más bien, en toda ocasión, con oración y ruego, presenten sus peticiones a Dios y denle gracias.
  • La paz de Dios, que sobrepasa todo entendimiento, cuidará sus corazones y sus pensamientos en Cristo Jesús.
  • Consideren bien todo lo verdadero, todo lo respetable, todo lo justo, todo lo puro, todo lo amable, todo lo digno de admiración, en fin, todo lo que sea excelente o merezca elogio.

Todos estos versículos vienen de Filipenses 4 (NVI). Mira el contexto: “Ruego a Evodia y también a Síntique que se pongan de acuerdo en el Señor. Y a ti, mi fiel compañero, te pido que ayudes a estas mujeres” (Filipenses 4:2-3 NVI).

En general, la iglesia filipense estaba bien, pero una controversia entre dos mujeres prominentes amenazaba con destruirla. El conflicto estaba tan serio que otra gente tenía que involucrarse para resolver el problema (un poco como Mateo 18:20!). Pablo dio a estos ayudantes instrucciones específicas para ayudar a resolver el conflicto: 

  1. Alégrense en el Señor (y no en la aprobación de otras personas) – versículo 4
  2. Mantengan la calma – versículo 5a
  3. Recuerden que Dios ve todo y que Jesús está volviendo – versículo 5b
  4. No estrésense por la tensión incómoda. Pidan que Dios dé la paz – versículo 6
  5. Dios dará la paz, aunque desde la perspectiva del mundo no debería haber paz  – versículo 7
  6. Asegúrense de encontrar algo bueno, cualquier cosa buena, sobre la otra persona. Piensen en estas buenas cosas, y no en lo que la otra persona hizo para hacerse daño – versículo 8
  7. Sigan el ejemplo de Pablo en estos asuntos – versículo 9

El contexto importa. Lee los libros de la Biblia como libros y no como colecciones de perogrulladas espirituales. Cuando haces esto, el Señor te dará una mayor comprensión de todo esto (2 Timoteo 2:7, NVI), porque conoces la verdad (1 Juan 2:20, NVI), y no necesitas que nadie te enseñe (1 Juan 2:27, NVI).

Ahora, ¿se usaron en contexto esos últimos versículos?

Filed Under: Method Tagged With: Conflict, Context, Interpretation, Philippians, Pinky and the Brain, Spanish

El peor enemigo de la interpretación es la observación 

May 12, 2026 By Peter Krol

This is a Spanish translation of a post from our archive. For the original post in English, please click the “Publicación original” link at the top of the post. For further explanation of why we’re posting articles in Spanish for a season, see this announcement.

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

La interpretación ocurre cuando descubrimos por qué un pasaje dice lo que dice. No logramos interpretar bien cuando nos falta entender por qué un pasaje dice lo que dice.

El obstáculo principal para la interpretación excelente es la observación.

Por supuesto, no creo que la observación sea una mala cosa. Ya he escrito sobre cómo debemos valorar la observación cuidadosa. La observación descuidada causa directamente una interpretación incorrecta. 

Sin embargo, al estudiar la Biblia, no puedes quedarte en la fase de observación. Es fácil creer que has estudiado la Biblia cuando, en realidad, solo la observas.

Por ejemplo, mucha gente usa Romanos 1:18-32 para mostrar que la humanidad es pecadora. ¡Una observación excelente! Pero, ¿por qué Pablo hace todo lo posible para demostrar cuán pecadora es la humanidad? Quizás es porque quiere armar un caso contra el lector de forma lenta e imperceptible. “Por tanto, no tienes excusa tú, quienquiera que seas, cuando juzgas a los demás” (Romanos 2:1, NVI).

Encontramos otro ejemplo en Filipenses 4:4-9. Este pasaje está lleno de dichos lindos que los cristianos citan con frecuencia. Nos encanta “alegrémonos siempre en el Señor” (Filipenses 4:4, NVI). Nos consuela presentar nuestras peticiones a Dios, con oración y ruego (Filipenses 4:6).

Esas son buenas observaciones. Pero, ¿por qué están aquí estos versículos? La iglesia de Filipos estaba pasando por una ruptura grave entre dos mujeres prominentes (Filipenses 4:2-3). Por esta razón, Pablo envió instrucciones a uno de sus compañeros en la iglesia para resolver el conflicto. Lee Filipenses 4:4-9 con esta perspectiva, y el pasaje cobra vida.

Las narraciones del Antiguo Testamento nos dan un último grupo de ejemplos. Al observar estos relatos, es posible que nos demos cuenta de todo tipo de personajes para imitar o evitar, pero todavía nos falta seguir con la interpretación. Ver a estos personajes como ejemplos no está mal (mira 1 Corintios 10:11), pero es demasiado fácil quedarse solo en la observación. ¿Por qué están allí estos relatos? Para mostrarnos a Jesús, por supuesto (Juan 1:45, Lucas 24:44-47). Lo importante, cada vez, es descubrir cómo.

Recuerda que no debes permitir que la familiaridad estorbe tu observación. Y no permitas que la observación estorbe tu interpretación.

Filed Under: Method Tagged With: Bible Study, Familiarity, Hindrances, Interpretation, Observation, Old Testament Narrative, Philippians, Romans, Spanish

Cosas para observar: Gramática

March 31, 2026 By Peter Krol

This is a Spanish translation of a post from our archive. For the original post in English, please click the “Publicación original” link at the top of the post. For further explanation of why we’re posting articles in Spanish for a season, see this announcement.

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

El filósofo Wittgenstein escribió: “Como todo lo metafísico, la armonía entre el pensamiento y la realidad se encuentra en la gramática del idioma.” Mi profesor de inglés de la secundaria diría que iba por buen camino.

Sin la gramática, sería difícil comunicarse. Por ejemplo, no tendrías los verbos. Solamente sujetos. Todo el tiempo. Sin acción. Quizás objetos. Frases breves. Mucha confusión. Histeria colectiva. Necesidad de claridad. Poco hablando. Ay, no podía hacerlo.

Después de observar las palabras de un texto bíblico, puedes seguir observando cómo el autor las ordena en frases. Eso significa que observamos la gramática.

La palabra “gramática” puede dar miedo. Puede hacernos pensar en los años que solían llamarse “los buenos tiempos” de la preadolescencia, evocando recuerdos de las espinillas, los bravucones y la presión parental. Sin embargo, estoy aquí para decirte que la gramática puede ser divertida. La gramática puede ser emocionante. De hecho, la gramática puede ser la puerta a la observación provechosa de la Biblia.

Usemos Lucas 2:1-21, NVI como nuestro texto otra vez. Observemos solamente el sujeto y el verbo de cada frase (o sea, miremos un poco de gramática básica). Mira lo que puedes ver:

  • Augusto César decretó
  • se levantara un censo
  • Este primer censo se efectuó
  • iban todos a inscribirse
  • José…subió
  • Fue a Belén
  • se le cumplió el tiempo
  • dio a luz…lo envolvió…y lo acostó
  • había unos pastores
  • un ángel del Señor se les apareció
  • la gloria del Señor los envolvió
  • se llenaron de temor
  • el ángel dijo
    • No tengan miedo
    • Miren
    • ha nacido 
    • que es Cristo
    • esto les servirá de señal: Encontrarán
  • apareció…una multitud de ángeles del cielo
  • los pastores se dijeron
    • Vamos a Belén…a ver
  • fueron de prisa y encontraron
  • contaron 
  • se asombraron
  • María…guardaba todas estas cosas
  • los pastores regresaron
  • todo sucedió tal como
  • lo llamaron

¿Para qué fue este ejercicio? Simplemente al sacar los detalles y observar la estructura básica de la frase (el sujeto y el verbo), terminamos con un resumen bastante bueno del relato de Lucas 2. Antes de continuar con la interpretación (comprender lo que significa el texto), necesitamos observar lo que dice el texto. Una forma de identificar lo que dice el autor es observar la gramática. Esta habilidad es importante cuando aprendemos cómo estudiar la Biblia.

Observar la gramática no es solamente para el género narrativo, como el relato de Lucas. La gramática también ayuda en otros géneros.

Por ejemplo, mira Filipenses 2:5-11 (NVI). Al reducirlo a la gramática básica, tenemos:

  • La actitud de ustedes debe ser como la de Cristo Jesús
    • Quien no consideró el ser igual a Dios como algo a qué aferrarse
      • Por el contrario, se rebajó
      • Se humilló a sí mismo
    • Por eso Dios lo exaltó

¿Qué quiere Pablo que hagamos aquí? Sé como Jesús. Cuando renunciamos a lo que merecemos (nos rebajamos) y asumimos lo que no merecemos (nos humillamos), no sabemos lo que Dios podría hacer en nuestra comunidad.

Filed Under: Method Tagged With: Grammar, Luke, Observation, Philippians, Spanish, Wittgenstein

When Humility is not Easy

November 28, 2025 By Peter Krol

It’s easy to forget humility and act like violent men when facing certain types of people. We’ll find help with three groups of people by considering the three places where New Testament authors quote Proverbs 3:34.

1. Those who have hurt me deeply

Charlie Barker (2011), Creative Commons
Charlie Barker (2011), Creative Commons

James has this first group in mind when he quotes Proverbs 3:34 to instruct the community to stop quarreling (Jas. 4:1-12). James argues that we each tend to love ourselves more than anyone else, so we fight for our rights. In the course of such conflict, we get hurt and want to retaliate. Instead, we must remember that our desires cannot give us what they promise. So we must turn to the Lord, because he always gives more grace than the world does. As we fear the Lord instead of focusing on ourselves, we become more humble people. Therefore it says, “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (Jas. 4:6).

2. Those who don’t deserve my trust

Peter has this second group in mind when he quotes Proverbs 3:34 to instruct the church to submit to the elders (1 Pet. 5:1-11). Elders are shepherds of the flock of God, but they must never be mistaken for the Chief Shepherd. When we put our leaders in the place of Jesus, they fail to deliver because they are neither divine nor sinless. When they fail, we tend to become disillusioned, anxious for the future of the church, and proud in our own opinions. Instead, we ought to fear the Lord more than we fear failure. This makes us both humble and effective, for “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (1 Pet. 5:5).

3. All the rest

Paul has all of us in mind when he draws us back to Christ’s humility to empower our own (Phil. 2:1-18). Does Christ encourage you? Does his love comfort you? Do you participate in his Spirit? Has God shown any affection or sympathy toward you? Jesus gave up what he deserved (his rights as God) and took on what he did not deserve (the role of a servant, the limitations of a human body, and the utter disgrace of death by crucifixion). He did it to rescue you from what you deserve (God’s judgment) and to give you what you do not deserve (God’s pleasure). Paul was so affected by Jesus’ humility that he was prepared to die himself if it meant his people would hold these truths more dearly.

Loving others wisely and humbly is not optional for followers of Christ. It’s the meat and potatoes of living by faith in community with other sinners. Wisdom must penetrate this crucial area of our lives. The fear of the Lord is the beginning, and when you fear the Lord you can’t help but become like him. That means dying for others, even if they’ve hurt you or if they don’t deserve it. When Jesus’ humility grips you, it changes everything about you. Don’t turn inward and deny yourself the opportunity to fear the Lord and know Jesus in his humility. As Raymond Ortlund writes:

If you would like to experience God with that humility, here is how you can. You look at the cross. You see a wise man hanging there, dying in the place of fools like you, because he loves you. You may despise him, but he does not despise you. You may be above him, but he humbled himself for you. Look there at him. Look away from yourself. Look at him, and keep looking until your pride melts. You will not only worship, you will begin to grow wise.[1]

This post was first published in 2013 and is part of a series walking through Proverbs 1-9.


[1] Proverbs: Wisdom that Works, Kindle location 537-540.

Disclosure: This link is an Amazon affiliate link. If you click it and buy stuff from Amazon, your purchase will help support our site.

Filed Under: Proverbs Tagged With: 1 Peter, Humility, James, Pain, Philippians, Proverbs

The Art of Observing What’s Not Said

January 13, 2023 By Peter Krol

We’ve mentioned it a thousand times: When we observe a passage of the Bible, we’re trying to figure out what it says. However, sometimes we won’t fully grasp what it says without first observing what it doesn’t say. Ryan has made this point in two recent posts with respect to characters’ names. But what’s not said applies to many other types of observation as well. Here are three examples.

Photo by HS Spender on Unsplash

Example #1: Luke 15:11-32

The parable commonly known as “The Prodigal Son” is really about Two Brothers. We’re told of the bad choices of the younger son (Luke 15:12-16), and his risky decision to come back home (Luke 15:17-19). We’re told about what happened upon his return (father runs to meet him, throws a party, etc., in Luke 15:20-24).

Then we’re told of the bad attitude and choices of the older son (Luke 15:25-30). We hear the father’s appeal to his grumbling son (Luke 15:31-32). But we never find out what he decided or what happened.

The two brothers are parallel to one another. Their stories are parallel. Up to the point where we expect to hear the choice and results of the older son’s decision. But that choice and its results are left unsaid. The parable simply ends on a cliffhanger.

What is the point of the omission? Jesus lets the end of the story play itself out in the response of the Pharisees and scribes who were grumbling (Luke 15:2). Luke 13-14 was all about the feast and joy of the kingdom of God. Will these grumbling scribes and Pharisees enter? Will those who are saved be few (Luke 13:23)?

Example #2: Psalm 55

This emotional poem is about the pain and paranoia of betrayal. The whole poem is rather scatter-shot, without a clearly discernible structure, perhaps reflecting the manic state David is in as he composes it.

David describes the anguish of his fear, terror, and horror (Ps 55:4-5). He wants nothing more than to get out of the situation (Ps 55:6-8). And he asks God to do something about the situation (Ps 55:9).

But look at the last line of the poem. As David’s complaints rise to their peak, notice where he finally lands. He does not put his trust in what God will do. That’s how I would end such a prayer; how about you?

Instead, he ends with a declaration of trust in God himself. This might not be how we expect the poem to end, so noticing what he doesn’t say makes what he actually says really pop.

Example #3: Philippians 4:4

Here is the verse in its entirety: “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice.”

In this example, I encourage you to observe what is not present at the beginning of the verse. Something that nearly everyone who reads the passage presumes is there, or at least they act like it’s there.

What is this absent wonder of which I speak? A transition.

This verse has no transition. No connector word at all to link it, divide it, or contrast it with the previous verse. This absence of a transition is one reason I believe Paul is not changing the subject. There is a “finally” in verse 8, which could be a transition to a new unit of thought (or simply conclude the list practical suggestions). Verse 10 switches from present to past tense and has “now at length,” which certainly signals a transition to a new idea.

So noticing what’s not said may help us to follow Paul’s argument, so we might avoid separating his counsel (Phil 4:4-9) from the very situation to which he directed that counsel (Phil 4:2-3).

Conclusion

Observing what’s not said is definitely an art and not a science, so you need to use common sense. Identify what you might expect from a passage. Then make sure to observe how (and whether) the text subverts those expectations to sharpen its argument. The biblical authors are constantly working to subvert our expectations so they might better persuade us to trust the Lord and seek first his kingdom.

Filed Under: Method Tagged With: Luke, Observation, Philippians, Psalms

Grammar Crash Course: Clauses

December 2, 2022 By Peter Krol

What makes this paragraph so strange?

Unsteadily wobbling toward me, when my son’s arms stretch out. In my heart of hearts like a flame. Speaking my name—”Papa”—for the first time, but sounding like too many margaritas: “Baba.” Joy to explode in here. Happiness over there. Resounding exultation on all sides. Not a toddler but a teenager-in-training. Flos floridus.

If I treated it like a poem and gave each unit of thought a separate line, there would be no big deal. You could probably follow along.

But as a standard prose paragraph, it doesn’t quite work. Despite hints of comprehensibility, there remains something sorely lacking. The paragraph’s citizens include not a single independent clause.

Photo by yang miao on Unsplash

Distinguishing Dependency

In English, there are two main types of clause: independent and dependent.

  • Independent clauses contain a complete thought that could function as a complete sentence.
  • Dependent clauses don’t contain a complete thought and can’t function as a complete sentence.

In the paragraph above, “unsteadily wobbling toward me” is not a complete thought because it has no subject, and -ing verbs cannot stand on their own as main verbs. To make the clause independent, I could add to it (He is unsteadily wobbling toward me) or revise it (He unsteadily wobbles toward me).

The grammatical rules and explanation of dependency can get far more complex than this, but the most important thing to know is this idea of a “complete” thought. Take any phrase or clause and say it out loud. Ask yourself: Could this stand by itself in a conversation? If so, it’s probably an independent clause. If not, it’s probably a dependent clause.

“When my son’s arms stretch out.” That could not stand alone; it must be dependent. “My sons arms stretch out”—that minor omission transforms the dependent clause into an independent one.

Why It Matters

Distinguishing dependent clauses from independent clauses may seem like an obscure and academic thing to do. Not the most thrilling way to occupy one’s morning. But this is perhaps the most important grammatical skill to master for your Bible study to go anywhere. Especially when you study epistles.

One of the greatest challenges of studying an epistle is that the sentences are often so loooooooong. We must have a way to identify which part of the sentence carries the most weight. Or how the parts relate to one another. Without that skill, all we’ve got is gut instinct. So we just camp out on a single word or phrase that strikes our fancy, and we reflect ponderously on the deep things of the universe contained in that word or phrase. And the apostles’ harps pop a string every time someone on earth reads their magnificent works of literature in such a demeaning manner.

When facing those long sentences, the best thing you can do is label the clauses as either independent or dependent. Then, set aside all the dependent clauses for a time to focus your attention on the independent clauses. The dependent clauses are dependent because they are depending on something. That something is going to be the more important part of the sentence. In other words, the independent clauses in a sentence contain the main idea(s) of the sentence. The dependent clauses are either window dressing or evidence for those main ideas. So to grasp the main ideas we must recognize the independent clauses.

If you fail to recognize independent clauses, you will fail to grasp the main point of a sentence. If you fail to grasp the main point of a sentence, you’ll fail to grasp the main point of the paragraph. Fail to do that, and… Well, let’s just say you might as well be looking at the Greek original (or if know Greek, let’s say you might as well be looking at an Urdu translation) for all the good it will do you.

Examples

In the ESV, Ephesians 1:3-4 is one long sentence. “Who has blessed us in Christ” and “even as he chose us in him” and “that we should be holy and blameless” are all dependent clauses. None of them carries the sentence’s main idea. “Blessed be the God and Father”—now we’re talking! That’s independent, containing a complete thought. So the main idea of the sentence is that God is blessed. The rest of the sentence expands on that idea and gives it more detail. But let’s make sure not to focus on the hows and whys of what God did to the point of forgetting Paul’s emphasis on who this God is. How blessed he is.

Or take Philippians 4:8. Every clause that starts with “whatever is” is dependent. The independent clause is “brothers…think about these things.” Now it is crucial to understand the nature of those things we ought to think about (true, honorable, etc.). But a word study on “true,” another on “honorable,” and another on “just” will prevent you from interpreting the sentence. Paul’s point is not to define a whole set of virtues. His purpose is to command his people to think about the right set of virtues.

Though it’s not from an epistle, John 3:16 gives another great case study. “That he gave his only Son” and “that whoever believes in him should not perish” are both dependent. The main, independent clause is “God so loved the world.” The dependent clauses explain how God loved the world (he gave his Son) and why God loved the world (so people could not perish but have life). But those ideas support the main idea that God loved the world. If we shift the emphasis from that main clause, we will struggle to make sense of what else Jesus says to Nicodemus in this passage.

Filed Under: Method Tagged With: Bible Study, Clause, Ephesians, Grammar, John, Observation, Philippians

Difficult texts: Colossians 1:24

March 12, 2021 By Tom Hallman

Recently I led a Bible Study in Colossians 1. It’s a fantastic chapter that radically exalts Christ and informs us of His absolute preeminence in all things.

Well, at least until you hit verse 24…

Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church. (Colossians 1:24 ESV, emphasis mine)

Wait a minute… did Paul really just say that? In Paul’s flesh he is filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions? How could he say that after what he had just written previously, that Jesus had made “peace by the blood of His cross.” (Colossians 1:20 ESV)?  What could possibly be lacking in Christ’s afflictions?

When we come upon such difficult texts, we’re left with several choices:

  1. Ignore the text: While that’s sometimes the best thing to do temporarily so that you can keep moving forward in trying to understand the rest of a passage, it’s neither good nor wise to ignore any teaching of Scripture (See 2 Tim 3:16-17).
  2. Guess its meaning: Sadly, this is what we tend to do all too often, and it means that what we come up with is at best unreliable – and quite possibly much worse. For example, it would be very wrong to conclude here that Christ’s atonement requires the work of another to be effective! Whenever in doubt, it’s better to say, “I don’t know” than to assume something false in Scripture.
  3. Use Scripture to interpret Scripture: While God does not give us every answer to every question in Scripture, He has nonetheless given us His knowable Word. So we ought to ask ourselves if Scripture answers this question itself. Let’s consider this option further.

Sometimes we need only look a verse or two away to find the meaning. In this case, however, we need to flip a couple pages back to Philippians 2. At the very end of that chapter we find this text:

I have thought it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus my brother and fellow worker and fellow soldier, and your messenger and minister to my need, for he has been longing for you all and has been distressed because you heard that he was ill. Indeed he was ill, near to death. But God had mercy on him, and not only on him but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow. I am the more eager to send him, therefore, that you may rejoice at seeing him again, and that I may be less anxious. So receive him in the Lord with all joy, and honor such men, for he nearly died for the work of Christ, risking his life to complete what was lacking in your service to me. (Philippians 2:25-30 ESV, emphasis mine)

Here Paul writes of Epaphroditus that he risked his life to complete (or fill up) what was lacking in the Philippians’ service to Paul. That’s very similar language to Colossians 1:24, but what does it mean?

Paul tells us a few verses earlier that Epaphroditus was a messenger sent from the Philippians to minister to Paul’s needs. So Paul is certainly not complaining of their deficiency of service. What else could it mean? It appears that because the Philippians could not themselves physically be present with Paul to minister to him, they sent a representative: Epaphroditus. So that is what Paul means by “what was lacking”.

With that in mind, let’s return again to Colossians 1:24:

Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church. (Colossians 1:24 ESV)

As was the case in the Philippians passage, Paul is not making up for some deficiency in Christ’s atoning work (as if one existed). Rather, because Christ has ascended to be seated at the right hand of His Father in heaven, He cannot be physically present to minister to the Colossians. So He sent a representative: Paul. Mystery solved!

Now, that’s only a tiny sampling of what can be gleaned from Colossians 1:24, but at least we’re safely back in line with the teaching of Scripture. We can confidently rejoice in the completed work of our knowable Savior, Jesus Christ, as demonstrated in His knowable Word.

Filed Under: Sample Bible Studies Tagged With: Colossians, Difficult Texts, Philippians

Context Matters: He Who Began a Good Work in You

May 24, 2019 By Peter Krol

Perhaps you’ve heard that the one who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ (Phil 1:6). Perhaps this promise has encouraged you to press on in the Christian life, maturing and becoming more like Jesus day by day. And while this could certainly be part of Paul’s intended meaning in this verse, perhaps there is something more in the context we tend to miss.

Context matters. When we learn to read the Bible properly—and not merely as a collection of quotable quotes or personal promises—we’ll find that some of our most familiar sayings have more to say than we typically assume.

Personal Sanctification

The popular usage of this verse—to refer to an individual’s sanctification between now and the day of judgment—can certainly be supported from the context.

Paul follows up the promise in verse 6 with a defense of how he feels toward the Philippians (Phil 1:7). He then prays for their love to abound, with knowledge and all discernment (Phil 1:9). He wants them to approve what is excellent (Phil 1:10a). And he wants them to be pure and blameless for the day of Christ (Phil 1:10b), filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ (Phil 1:11).

So with the repetition of “day of (Jesus) Christ,” the explanation of his affection, and the clarification of each person’s purity and righteousness—the popular use of this verse to refer to individual sanctification fits. So much, so good.

Communal Partnership

But look at what else we find in the surrounding context.

“I thank my God in all my remembrance of you…because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now.”

Phil 1:3-5

The sentence immediately preceding the promise of verse 6 is Paul’s expression of prayerful thanks for the Philippians’ financial partnership in his gospel ministry. Paul will return to this thanksgiving in chapter 4. In fact, he likely asks them to stop giving, since he knows they can’t really afford it (“Not that I seek the gift itself…” Phil 4:17).

In short, we see that the letter of Philippians is, at its heart, a thank-you letter from a missionary to members of his support team. And in that light, it is altogether possible that when Paul wrote of the “good work,” begun “in you,” and “brought to completion at the day of Christ,” he was speaking of this gospel partnership. God’s good work among you, Philippians, includes this outrageous generosity, which has borne much fruit in Paul’s labors around the world.

And it will be brought to completion when the final harvest is reaped on the last day, when Jesus returns to judge. The gospel will go forth, and the good work of God will be completed when the redeemed have been gathered in.

We Don’t Have to Pick One

I don’t think we can or should nail down exactly one thing that Paul meant by the “good work.” He certainly has their financial partnership in mind. But then he also immediately moves into their personal sanctification (of which their financial partnership is but one expression).

So I’m not arguing that Phil 1:6 is not about personal sanctification. I only want to add that, when we see how their communal partnership is also in view, we see personal sanctification tangibly demonstrated in the community. In this way, Phil 1:6 is similar to 3 John 8, which describes financial support of missionaries in partnership language, and as an expression of walking in the truth (3 John 4).

Context matters.


Thanks to my colleague Dave Royes for the idea for this post.

For more examples of why context matters, click here. 

Filed Under: Sample Bible Studies Tagged With: Context, Philippians

Context Matters: I Can Do All Things Through Him Who Strengthens Me

March 8, 2019 By Peter Krol

Perhaps you’ve seen the face paint or placard at an athletic event: “I can do all things through him who strengthens me.” Sometimes the mere reference “Phil 4:13” is enough to inspire. Perhaps you’ve drawn on this verse to motivate your best efforts and deep confidence. But is that what Paul had in mind when he wrote it?

Context matters. When we learn to read the Bible properly—and not merely as a collection of proof-texts for personal inspiration—we’ll find that some of our most familiar verses speak to situations we hadn’t considered.

Encouraging Quotes (2016), Creative Commons

What are the “All Things”?

Phil 4:13 ends a paragraph where Paul expresses joy at how concerned the Philippian church has been for him. And their “concern” was expressed through financial support of his ministry (Phil 4:15-16, 18).

Paul rejoices at their concern for him, but he wants to make sure they know that he is not in grave need (Phil 4:11). His need is not great because he has learned to be content in whatever situation he finds himself. He knows how be brought low, and he knows how to abound. He can handle plenty and abundance. He can handle hunger and need (Phil 4:12).

In other words, in all circumstances, he has learned how to be content with his lot, and to make it last as long as it must. How can he do this?

Because the one who strengthens him enables him to do it. He can survive any and every situation without panicking or being anxious. So these are the “all things” he can do: plenty and hunger, abundance and need. He can do (live with) them all, for whatever he has is just enough.

Why Does Paul Say This?

We know from the historical context that the Philippian Christians were not wealthy people themselves. Their generous contributions to Paul were given as a test of affliction, despite their extreme poverty (2 Cor 8:1-2). Though they have expressed their “concern” for Paul by giving generously, Paul has his own concern: that they may have given even beyond their means (2 Cor 8:3). This gives him a great opportunity to spur on the wealthier Corinthians to greater generosity. But it leaves him in a tough spot with the Philippians.

Is it really in their best interests to continue giving to him when they have greater need than he does?

So it’s likely that one of Paul’s motives for writing to the Philippians was to ask them to stop giving! He makes his request in quite a roundabout way, so as not to communicate any lack of gratitude.

  • “It was kind of you to share in my trouble” (Phil 4:14).
  • No church partnered with me financially except you (Phil 4:15).
  • You gave time and again during my time in Thessalonica (Phil 4:16).
  • I don’t want your money, though I am so grateful for the fruit it has borne, which is to your credit (Phil 4:17).
  • I’ve received it all. I’ve received enough, and more. I am well supplied already (Phil 4:18).
  • My God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in Christ Jesus (Phil 4:19). In other words, may God continue to grant you exceptional contentment in all circumstances.

Conclusion

Paul wants the Philippians to know that, while he is tremendously grateful for their donations, he does not need them to keep giving for him to continue in ministry. In case they fear he’ll go bankrupt without them, he wants them to know that the Lord Jesus strengthens him to endure both plenty and need, making the most of his available resources.

Context matters.


Thanks to Alison and Daniel for the idea for this post.

For more examples of why context matters, click here. 

Filed Under: Sample Bible Studies Tagged With: Context, Interpretation, Philippians

Context Matters: Forgetting What Lies Behind

March 1, 2019 By Peter Krol

Perhaps you’ve heard that you ought not dwell too much on the past. Especially your regrets, failures, or inadequacies. Or maybe you’ve been to a business seminar, inspiring you to keep the past in the past and press on toward a glorious vision of the company’s future. At such times, especially if it was a Christian business conference, you may have heard reference to Phil 3:13: “…forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead…” Now are these things really what Paul had in mind?

Context matters. When we learn to read the Bible properly—and not merely as a collection of sound bites or independent proverbial sayings—we’ll find that some of our most familiar verses mean something other than what we may have assumed.

The Statement

Believe it or not, the phrase in question is part of a complete sentence:

“But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.” (Phil 3:13b-14)

Paul states that he does one thing. And this one thing has three parts.

  1. Forgetting what lies behind
  2. Straining forward to what lies ahead
  3. Pressing on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.

The first two parts set up the third part. So the “one thing” is really just the third part. The first two parts are the prerequisites for the third part.

So what Paul is after is to press on toward the goal, which is the prize of God’s upward call in Christ Jesus. Now what does that mean?

Haakon von Martinsky (2014), Creative Commons

Work Backwards

The sentence immediately before this is: “Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own” (Phil 3:13a). A critical interpretive question we ought to ask is: “What is ‘it’?” What is the thing Paul has not yet made his own?

Going back one more sentence, we see: “Not that I have already obtained this…but I press on to make it my own…” (Phil 3:12). So here we see Paul pressing on for something—a good sign that it’s the same thing as “the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.” But we still don’t know what “it” is. What is the thing Paul wants to make his own, which he has not yet obtained?

Going back one more sentence, we hit a very long sentence, which ends like this:

“…that I may know him and the power of his resurrection…that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead” (Phil 3:10-11).

Now we’re getting somewhere! So the thing Paul presses on toward, that he wants to attain, is the resurrection of the dead. So it makes sense that he would later call this “the upward call.” Just as God called his Son Jesus Christ up from the grave to new life, so he calls Paul to new life, to resurrection from the dead.

Now how does this affect the way we read the phrase “forgetting what lies behind”?

The Things Paul Left Behind

We must go back a little further into the context to see what exactly Paul has left behind. What has made up his “life,” according to which he must “die” (Phil 3:10), so he might attain to resurrection?

In verse 3, Paul claims to be part of “the circumcision,” which is defined as those “who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh.” This is in contrast to the dogs and evildoers who “mutilate the flesh” (Phil 3:2). So circumcision is not about mutilating flesh—about cutting off a foreskin—but about putting no confidence in the flesh.

Paul has much reason for confidence in the flesh (Phil 3:4-6). Circumcised on the eighth day, an Israelite from the tribe of Benjamin, a superb Hebrew, a meticulous keeper of the Law, a zealous persecutor of “false” religions, a blameless adherent to the righteousness of the law.

“But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him” (Phil 3:7-9).

So all that important stuff that made up Paul’s pedigree—all the things in which he had taken pride—are now considered but manure scrapings stuck to his sandals. He was happy to lose it all for the sake of Christ. He has suffered the loss of these things so he might have new life in Christ. He has thereby shared in Christ’s sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that he might attain the resurrection from the dead (Phil 3:10-11).

Conclusion

So that which lies behind Paul, which he is committed to “forget,” is all the great stuff on his spiritual CV that formerly shaped his identity. It was all his accomplishments, his law-keeping, his zeal for God, and his righteousness. He sets all these things aside so he might obtain new life, resurrection, through knowing Jesus and becoming like him.

So this verse is not about forgetting your failures or regrets. (In fact, it’s often important to remember these things to highlight God’s grace at work in you – Eph 2:1-4, 11-13.) And it’s not about casting vision for the future. It’s about repenting of your self-reliance, and coming to realize you have absolutely nothing to offer to make you right with God. Even your obedience to God and your ministry in service to him—such things ought never be your confidence.

“Let those of us who are mature think this way, and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you” (Phil 3:15).

Context matters.


Thanks to Josh T for the idea for this post, and for showing me the flow of Paul’s argument in Philippians 3.

For more examples of why context matters, click here. 

Filed Under: Sample Bible Studies Tagged With: Context, Grace, Growth, Philippians

Next Page »

Find it here

Have It Delivered

Get new posts by email:

Connect

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter
Follow Me

Learn to Study the Bible

Learn to Lead Bible Studies

Popular Posts

  • Check it Out
    What ‘Inductive’ and ‘Deductive’ Really Mean

    I've written before about why I never use the term "Inductive Bible Study"...

  • Proverbs
    Don’t Mess with God’s Wife

    The Sower of Discord is the third of Solomon’s three fools in Prov 6:1-19...

  • Sample Bible Studies
    Context Matters: Jesus Came to Give Abundant Life

    Jesus's words about abundant life do not promise riches or health. He offer...

  • Proverbs
    Why “Proverbs Aren’t Promises” is Misleading

    Pick up a book with Bible-reading advice, and you'll barely get your nose i...

  • Method
    Summary of the OIA Method

    I've argued that everyone has a Bible study method, whether conscious or un...

  • Sample Bible Studies
    Identifying Behemoth and Leviathan in the Book of Job

    In Job 40-41, God introduces Job to two new characters. Behemoth is a power...

  • Sample Bible Studies
    Why Elihu is So Mysterious

    At a recent pastor's conference on the book of Job, a leader asked the atte...

  • Method
    La transición desde la interpretación hasta la aplicación

    This is a Spanish translation of a post from our archive. For the original...

  • Sample Bible Studies
    Context Matters: The Ten Commandments

    The Ten Commandments are not rules from a cold and distant judge. They are...

  • Sample Bible Studies
    Context Mattered to Jesus

    Jesus refuses to turn stones into bread. The way he justifies this using Sc...

Categories

  • About Us (3)
  • Announcements (68)
  • Check it Out (727)
  • Children (16)
  • Exodus (51)
  • Feeding of 5,000 (7)
  • How'd You Do That? (11)
  • Leading (120)
  • Method (325)
  • Proverbs (121)
  • Psalms (78)
  • Resurrection of Jesus (6)
  • Reviews (77)
  • Sample Bible Studies (244)
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT